Name of dropdown file: custom.js
John Ott, Light Pioneer
by
Ramon Sender Barayon
Originally Published in The Whole Earth Review 1986
Photobiology, the study of the effects of light on living things, is relatively
new as a formal field of scientific inquiry. Only over the past ten years
has it become acceptable to question the quality of artificial light we live by
and to look more closely at how the human organism responds to sunlight.
Recent articles in the popular press attest to exciting discoveries, for
example the January 14th New Yorker of
this year, which reported a conference titled 'The Medical and Biological
Effects of Light.' Curiously, the article never once mentioned John Nash
Ott who deserves much of the credit for awakening interest in this subject.
During his career as a banker in Chicago, John Ott developed his hobby of
time-lapse photography into a successful sideline. We have all seen his
blossoming flowers in such Walt Disney films as "Nature's Half
Acre." It was while filming plants under various lighting conditions
that Ott noticed how their reactions varied. A reprint of an article from Smithsonian
Magazine in the September 22nd San
Francisco Chronicle's "This World" section described how Ott
went on to study the responses of both flora and fauna to specific
wavelengths. Filming through a microscope, he found that the pigment
granules in both animal cells and chloroplasts exhibited specific behavior patterns
to different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.
'Quoting from this article by Jack Fincher:
"Ott went looking for examples of humans whose health and well-being
appeared directly affected by light, and he believed he found them. In
one, a laboratory where contact lenses were made, the employees were remarkably
free of flue. The lab had plastic windows which admitted ultraviolet
light. This is screened out by ordinary glass; that is why
you cannot get a suntan inside.
'Another was a seafood restaurant in a hotel. The restaurant had black light
(ultraviolet) decor. The health record of the restaurant employees was so
outstanding that management could not believe it, especially when the compared
the record with those of employees in other departments of the hotel.
'Ott concluded that by deliberately screening out supposedly harmful traces of
atmospheric ultraviolet with tinted windows, sunglasses, suntan lotions and the
like, we may be making ourselves more vulnerable to "malillumination"
than we ever were to malnutrition caused by lack of trace minerals in our
diets.'
His book Health And Light, first
published in 1973 and now available in an updated Pocket Book edition,
describes many of his early experiences and discoveries. One personal
anecdote: Ott himself was suffering from severe arthritis of the hip which
doctors said would ultimately require a plastic replacement. Although in
the habit of wearing sunglasses because his eyes were sensitive to glare, on
this particular day he had broken his best pair and went out without
them. He was doing some chores with the aid of his cane when suddenly he
didn't seem to need it. His hip had not felt so well in years, and he
began walking up and down the driveway without his cane to test it.
Sensing his improvement was related to the effect of unfiltered sunlight on his
eyes, he made a point to expose himself as little as possible to filtered
sun. On a subsequent trip to Florida gradually strengthened his eyes to
the point where their sensitivity to glare was reduced. The results were
so beneficial that within a week he was playing several rounds of golf and
walking on the beach without a cane.
Quoting from Ott:
'Theories may be interesting to think about... but this was affecting my own arthritis, a much more personal matter. Maybe I was one of the lucky people who get better for no reason at all, but I felt strongly that there was a reason. I had taken off my glasses and let the full unfiltered natural sunlight into my eyes and had also made a point of being outdoors six hours or more a day whether it was sunny or cloudy. To me the results were convincing enough: that light received through the eyes must stimulate the pituitary or some other gland such as the pineal about which not much was known.'
At the time he wrote these words, the pineal gland was still described in
textbooks as a vestigal remnant of our reptile ancestry. For
example, in lizards and frogs the 'parietal eye,' as the pineal was named,
functioned as a register of solar radiation. Located just under the skin,
it still contained a miniature cornea,lens and retina. Going up the
evolutionary ladder, the pineal in birds was no longer a sensory organ but a
gland.
In the mid-sixties, Dr. Richard J. Wurtman of M.I.T.'s Laboratory of
Neuroendocrinology discovered that the growth of the reproductive glands in
some mammals was regulated by a pineal hormone named melatonin.
Furthermore the release of melatonin was controlled by neural linkages between
the eyes and the gland itself. In a July 1975 Scientific American
article, Dr. Wurtman delineated some segments of the specific pathway by which
light stimulated the ovary of a rat. I quote:
'Receptors in the retina gave rise to a chain of nerve impulses that travelled via a chain of synapses through the brain, the brain stem and the spinal cord, ultimately decreasing the activity of neurons running to the superior cervical ganglion (in the neck) and of the sympathetic nerves that reenter the cranium and travel to the pineal organ. There the decrease in activity reduces both the synthesis and secretion of melatonin. With less melatonin in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid, less reaches the brain centers (probably the hypothalamus) on which melatonin acts to suppress secretion of luteinizing hormone from the anterior pituitary. Thus more hormone is released, facilitating ovarian growth and presumably ovulation.'
If accredited investigators found it hard to change the mindset of the scientific
community, it is easy to see why John Ott's discoveries were laughed off.
His lack of scientific credentials made his credibility suspect to the medical
establishment even though he conducted his experiments with scrupulous
care. Working with pigment epithelial cells found in the retina of the
eye and which were then thought to have no visibility function, Ott was able to
demonstrate that the cells responded to given wavelengths and intensities
of light in the same manner as chloroplasts in plants. He suggested that
these similar responses might be involved in the photoreceptor mechanism which
stimulated the retinal-hypothalamic-endocrine system in animals and in turn
influenced the hormonal balance of the body.
Retiring to Florida, he founded the Environmental Health and Light Institute
where he struggled for years for the funding necessary to continue his
work. He investigated the effect of light on the growth of tumors,
the interconnection between school lighting and hyperactivity in children.
He showed how cells exposed to red light suffered a weakening and consequent
rupturing of their walls, the effect especially noticeable in the heart cells
of a chicken embryo which led him to speculate as to a possible connection
between the high red content in ordinary incandescent light bulbs and coronary
disorders.
In another article published in the text Frontiers Of Pineal Physiology by the MIT Press in 1945, Dr. Wurtman delineated the eye to pineal pathway further:
'Light stimuli reach the pineal by a circuitous route ultimately involving the sympathetic nervous system. Photoreceptors in the eye respond to environmental lighting by generating nerve impulses that are transmitted along the optic nerve. Most of these impulses travel to brain centers associated with vision. A small fraction of the impulses diverges from the main visual pathway and travels along a nerve bundle (the inferior accessory optic tract) which leads to the central hypothalamic neurons involved in the regulation of the sympathetic system. From this point the pathway descends via the spinal cord to preganglionic neurons supplying the superior cervical ganglia; the postganglionic neurons then ascend to the pineal where they act by liberating the neurotransmitter norepinephrine.'
Today it is generally accepted that the pineal acts as a regulator of
regulators within the body's endocrine system. Monitoring the quality of
light in our environment, it adjusts the hormonal balance accordingly,
affecting such diverse functions as growth and development, body temperature,
electrolyte balance, diurnal rhythms, blood sedimentation and many types of
blood cell counts. According to Dr. Fritz Hollwich in his book The
Influence of Ocular Light Perception On Metabolism In Man And In Animal,
published in 1979 by Springer-Verlag, the quality of light we live with also
affects kidney function, water and electrolyte balance, protein and liver
metabolism, blood sugar, insulin production and the functioning of the
thyroid. What has been left out? I don't think it would be an
exaggeration to say that almost every body parameter is influenced in some
manner by the quality of light in our environment.
Everyone who enjoys sitting in the sun or sunbathing knows there must be
measurable physiological responses behind this almost universal pastime.
In retrospect, it seems unbelievable it took researchers so long to accept the
fact that the we respond in many different ways to electromagnetic
stimuli. However ultraviolet light has received a great deal of bad
press. The average person's view has been based on the seasonal
warnings not to overdo sunbathing sessions at the beach and to protect their
eyes with sunglasses. Of course the short ultraviolet rays, most of which
are stopped by the ozone layer of the atmosphere, are destructive in quantity
to living tissue. But the long ultraviolet used in black lights is not
hazardous in the trace amounts that occur naturally outdoors. Like so
many things, it's a question of the proper dosage. The balance presented
to us in sunlight, whether in full strength or in semishade, seems to be what
we need for optimum health. Not too surprising considering the millions
of years we lived as naked hunter-gatherers out under the sun.
The New Yorker article also mentioned
reports of encouraging results in the treatment of depression and jet lag by
the use of bright lights. In the case of Dr. Alfred J. Lewy in Oregon, he
recommended the use of fluorescents of the Vita-Lite type produced by
Duro-Test. They should be used at a strength four times greater than
ordinary room lighting. The Vita-Lite was developed by John Ott
twenty-five years ago and he claims it is inferior to his new full spectrum
fluorescent fixtures that are radiation shielded and provide a separate socket
for an ultraviolet black light. In his most recent book, Light,
Radiation And You, published by Devin-Adair
in 1982 and updated in 1975, he discusses differences between available
fluorescents in detail as well as some of his most recent findings.
Gradually the recognition and honor John Ott richly deserved has begun to come
to him, an honorary Doctor of Science degree from Loyola University and the
Grand Honors Award of the National Eye Research Foundation among others.
In his July 1985 newsletter, he announced a startling new discovery:
'Possibly the most important development is the finding that when a drop of
human blood is placed on an ultraviolet transmitting microscope slide and then
placed directly in front of a video display terminal for five minutes, it will
cause long chain clumping of the red blood cells known as 'Rouleau.' The
clumping effect has been recognized by doctors for quite some time but has been
attributed to poor diet (too much fat) and lack of exercise. Medication to
thin the blood has been used.
'However, our finding is that if the slide with the blood sample is then placed
directly in front of the low-level ultraviolet light source of an Ott-Lite (tm)
radiation shielded fixture for another five minutes, the Rouleau clumping will
be broken up. This clumping of the red blood cells restricts the flow of
blood through the capillaries and is thought by many doctors to be a contributing
cause to many degenerative types of conditions, including Alzheimer's Disease.
'This finding with pictures is included in an article in the July 1985 issue of
the International Journal For Biosocial Research, P.O. Box 1174, Tacoma,
Washington 98401. '
Reprints of the article as well as copies of John Ott's books are available
from The Downtown Bookstore, 1500 Main Street, Sarasota, Florida 33577.
I recently telephoned Dr.Ott at his home to ask if he had anything to add to my
comments.
"Well, the most alarming information is that we have repeated the clumping
experiments several times and confirmed our original findings," he told
me. "There's no question of a doubt, and it's much worse with a
video display terminal than with an average television set of a comparable
size. The equipment in the terminals seems to give off greater magnetic
fields, and we think this problem is due to the magnetic fields magnetizing the
iron in the hemoglobin, causing them to have a polarity that makes them
line up just like a bunch of little magnets.
"However we find that getting the person outdoors or seating them directly
in front of our full-spectrum lighting with ultraviolet reverses the
condition. The ultraviolet seems to be an important factor in breaking up
this clumping. Being able to show so quickly the effect of video display
terminals on the red blood cells and the reversing of this condition in
sunlight is going to be a very helpful demonstration.
"However the initial response from video display terminal manufacturers
has been very discouraging. Of course they see dollars going out the window.
But in the long run, it's going to be a different story. I was just
reading an article on class action suits, particularly the asbestos
problem. I think there is a growing realization that the electronics
industry has a far greater liability from all this radiation pollution,
especially with the PCB's used in transformers and fluorescent light
ballasts. The New York Times had
an article about a major problem that developed at the Smithsonian Institute
from the leakage of this material out of the ballasts in fluorescent light
fixtures. This seems to me a major liability. It's just unfortunate
that everybody waits until legal action is taken before doing anything about
it.
"The good news is that we have had good reports from several places where
they have installed our full spectrum radiation-shielded fluorescent fixtures
in computer rooms. The people working there have said they feel so much
better, and no longer have the headaches and eyestrain and other problems.
Of course, when you do something for somebody, there's a psychological effect
and they feel better. We have to be certain that there is more than just
a psychological effect, and plan to do a series of tests using this
blood-clumping result."
"I recently placed a black light over my color television and leave it on
when I watch programs," I said. "Is there such a thing as
getting too much black light?"
"Of course there's always the problem of getting too much of anything
including oxygen. The lights that we are making of course have the proper
size tube for the number and size of visible light tubes in each fixture.
What size tube do you have?"
"About eighteen inches."
"Well, one of those I am sure would be all right. Of course our
fluorescent tubes are protected with lead foil on the ends where the cathodes
emit x-ray radiation, and the fixtures in addition the ultraviolet transmitting
plastic diffusers have a wire grid to ground their radio frequency. Also,
in my book I recommend using the daylight incandescent bulb in the place of the
regular one. The daylight has the blue glass which cuts down on the
excessive amount of red which comes from the ordinary incandescent light bulb.
"You can get the Vita-Lite which I developed twenty-five years ago with
the Duro-Test company, but that was just adding ultraviolet phosphor into their
fluorescent tubes of the full visible spectrum type developed originally for
color-matching purposes. They added the ultraviolet directly into the
tube and then found that the phosphor had only an effective burning life of
about one-third of the visible. It's gone long before the tube finally
burns out, and there's no easy way to tell when it occurs. That's why
with the new Ott-Lite we have added the small black light tube separately."
"What about these Gro-Lites what people use for indoor plants?"
"I've got one here and I'm trying to get a spectral analysis of it to see
how much UV it has. But it's my understanding that the Gro-Lite has that
bluish glass similar to the daylight incandescent. I'm not certain it
actually gives off any ultraviolet. That's something I'm looking into
right now.
I asked him how he felt at having his years of work finally vindicated.
"Of course I am really pleased at the interest being shown now," he
replied. "The scientific community is beginning to recognize that
light is an important variable that should be considered and controlled,
especially in research laboratories. As I have said in my articles, I
have been trying to bring lighting under scientific control rather than leaving
it up to the janitor and building maintenance."